Overview
This entry explores the understanding that reality is not a fixed structure, but a personal experience shaped by perception. Rather than existing as a single objective field, reality unfolds differently for each individual based on lived experience, sensitivity, and inner state.
Within this framework, sound functions as a mirror rather than a message.
Experience Before Definition
Reality is not first encountered through language.
It is lived through sensation, memory, emotion, and attention. Concepts arrive later, attempting to describe what has already occurred. By the time language appears, experience has already shaped meaning.
This precedence of experience over explanation is central to understanding how sound operates within the project.
Perception as World-Maker
The world one inhabits is defined by perception.
Two individuals may occupy the same physical space while living entirely different realities. What differs is not the environment, but the internal orientation through which it is received.
As perception shifts, the world reorganizes itself accordingly.
Truth as Individual Encounter
Truth does not arrive as a universal statement.
It arrives as recognition. As resonance. As something felt rather than agreed upon. Each listener encounters sound through their own history, memory, and inner landscape.
This does not fragment truth.
It multiplies it.
Sound as Reflective Medium
Within this context, music does not instruct or persuade.
It reflects.
Listeners do not receive the same message. They receive themselves, filtered through sound. Meaning emerges internally rather than being transmitted externally.
This reflective quality allows the work to remain open without becoming ambiguous.
No Single Interpretation
Attempts to define a single meaning inevitably reduce the field.
Sound that emerges from lived perception cannot be confined to one interpretation without losing its vitality. Each encounter is valid precisely because it is personal.
This openness is intentional.
Community Without Uniformity
The audience that gathers around such work does not form through agreement.
It forms through resonance.
People from different cultures, languages, and backgrounds recognize something familiar without needing to name it. The shared element is not interpretation, but experience.
Relation to the Series
This understanding clarifies:
-
why the work resists definitive explanation
-
why listeners report vastly different experiences
-
why no single narrative can contain the whole
It provides context for both the first and second seasons, and for the diversity of expressions that follow.
Extensions and Projects
Notes
This entry does not argue against shared reality. It documents an experiential understanding in which meaning arises through perception, allowing sound to function as a living mirror rather than a fixed statement.